A contemporary analysis of palliative procedures in aborted pancreatoduodenectomy: Morbidity, mortality, and impact on future therapy.

BACKGROUND: Periampullary malignancies are often unresectable tumors that frequently cause biliary or duodenal obstruction. Advances in endoscopic and percutaneous options have lessened the need for operative palliation. Nevertheless, many patients are still found to be unresectable at the time of exploration, making palliative bypass a consideration. Several prior studies have examined the morbidity of operative palliation, but many were conducted over lengthy time periods, and few have examined the impact of these procedures on future therapy. This study is a contemporary analysis of the short- and long-term outcomes of palliative bypass procedures for unresectable periampullary malignancies at a single high-volume institution. METHODS: We identified a contemporary cohort of patients in whom a pancreatoduodenectomy was planned for periampullary malignancy but instead underwent an aborted procedure. Patients were divided into 5 procedure groups: laparoscopy only, laparotomy with or without cholecystectomy, gastrointestinal bypass, biliary bypass, and double bypass (gastrointestinal and biliary). Data regarding the patient cohort, procedures, morbidity/mortality, and the interval to initiation of systemic therapy were collected prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Between July 2011 and November 2018, 128 out of 615 (17%) patients had an aborted pancreatoduodenectomy; 113 out of 128 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and 86 (67.1%) had duodenal or biliary obstruction at the time of operation. Patients who underwent laparoscopy only (n = 34) had no operative complications and a 90-day mortality of 6%; 88% of these patients went on to receive systemic therapy (median 21 days postprocedure). Double bypass was associated with a far lesser complication rate than in prior studies; 17% of patients had some complication(s), but only 9% had a severe complication. The 90-day all-cause mortality was 13%, and only 71% of these patients went on to receive systemic therapy (median 47 days postprocedure). Notably, 27 out of 34 (79%) of patients who underwent laparoscopy alone needed additional procedures for local obstruction, whereas only 5 out of 42 (12%) double bypass patients needed additional interventions. Median survival for the entire cohort was 10.3 months. CONCLUSION: Palliative procedures in this cohort had a far lesser complication rate than that of historical series. Palliative procedures, however, delayed systemic therapy, and a fair number of patients never received additional treatments. Palliative procedures markedly decreased the need for future interventions. Intraoperative decisions regarding palliative procedures must incorporate the functional status and motivations of the patient; these procedures are increasingly safe but may still affect survival.

Laparoscopic Gastroileal Bypass with Single Anastomosis: Analysis of the First 1512 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Biliopancreatic diversion is perceived as the most effective operation for long-term treatment of massive obesity. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that gastroileal bypass with single anastomosis is a safe and feasible procedure with similar results to the classic derivation, but reducing surgical time without decreasing the efficacy. METHODS: Descriptive, observational, prospective study of patients undergoing gastroileal bypass with single anastomosis between April 2010 and December 2015. The postoperative follow-up was 24 months. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred twelve patients underwent gastroileal bypass. The mean time of the procedure was 32 min; the average stay was 2.2 days. 30.1% of patients lost more than 100% of their excess weight, and 72.35% of patients lost more than 75% of their excess weight. 95.17% of patients dropped to a BMI < 35; 75.99% to a BMI < 30 and 30.15% to a BMI < 25. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroileal bypass with single anastomosis is a safe and fast procedure providing similar results to biliopancreatic diversion with respect to weight loss.

Comparison of Meal Pattern and Postprandial Glucose Response in Duodenal Switch and Gastric Bypass Patients.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery improves glucose homeostasis; however, side effects such as hypoglycemia can occur. We investigated the effects of meals on interstitial glucose (IG) response in biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP)-operated patients at least 1 year after surgery. METHODS: Thirty patients treated with BPD-DS or RYGBP were recruited at the outpatient Obesity Unit, Uppsala University Hospital. IG was measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 3 consecutive days, and postprandial IG levels from 5 to 120 min were analyzed for 2 of these days. All intake of food and beverages was simultaneously registered in a food diary, which was processed using The Meal Pattern Questionnaire. RESULTS: Postprandial IG levels were significantly lower in BPD-DS (n = 14) compared to RYGBP (n = 15)-treated patients, with mean concentrations of 5.0 (± 1.0) and 6.3 (± 1.8) mmol/L respectively (p < 0.001). The mean postprandial IG increment was lower in BPD-DS than in RYGBP patients, 0.2 (± 0.6) vs. 0.4 (± 1.4) mmol/L (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the postprandial IG variability was less pronounced in BPD-DS than in RYGBP patients. The mean number of daily meals did not differ between the two groups, 7.8 (± 2.6) in BPD-DS and 7.2 (± 1.7) in the RYGBP (p = 0.56). CONCLUSION: BPD-DS patients demonstrated lower postprandial IG concentrations, with smaller postprandial IG increments and less pronounced postprandial IG variability compared to RYGBP patients. The two groups had similar meal pattern and the postprandial IG responses is probably associated with differences in postoperative physiology.

Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Patients with Biliopancreatic Diversion After 10 Years of Follow-up, and Relationship with Vitamin D and Serum Calcium.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a matter of concern after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between SHPT, 25(OH)D, and calcium after BPD. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis in obese patients after BPD performed between 1998 and 2016. METHODS: Patients with at least 1 year of follow-up were included. SHPT was considered when PTH > 65 pg/mL in the absence of an elevated corrected calcium. 25(OH)D (ng/mL) status was defined as: deficiency < 20, insufficiency 20-29.9, and sufficiency ≥ 30. RESULTS: In total, 321 patients were included (76.6% women), with mean age 43.0 (10.5) years. Median follow-up was 6.0 (IQR 3.0-9.0) years. Mean body mass index was 49.8 (7.0) kg/m2. SHPT increased to a maximum of 81.9% in the ninth year of follow-up (95% CI: 1.5-9.1). Two years after surgery, 33.9% of patients with 25(OH)D sufficiency had SHPT (p = 0.001). Corrected calcium levels were lower in patients with PTH > 65 pg/mL when compared with PTH < 65 pg/mL; 1 year: 8.96 vs 9.1 mg/dL and 5 years: 8.75 vs 9.12 mg/dL (p < 0.01). After surgery, patients with PTH > 65 pg/mL and 25(OH)D sufficiency had lower corrected calcium levels when compared with subjects with PTH and 25(OH)D in normal range. Two years: 9.0 vs 9.2 mg/dL (p < 0.05) and 4 years: 8.9 vs 9.2 mg/dL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Once 25(OH)D is sufficient, the increase in PTH persists associated with a decrease in serum corrected calcium. It is important to ensure a sufficient calcium intake in these patients in order to avoid SHPT and osteomalacia in the future.

Type 2 Diabetes Remission and Control in Overweight and in Mildly Obese Diabetic Patients at Long-Term Follow-Up After Biliopancreatic Diversion.

BACKGROUND: In severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the metabolic benefits after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) are due to mechanisms independent of weight loss. Therefore, the anti-diabetic effect of BPD in overweight or mildly obese T2DM patients was investigated. METHODS: Ninety T2DM patients with BMI 25-35 underwent BPD and were evaluated 1 and 5 years after the operation (follow-up rate 100 and 83%, respectively). RESULTS: T2DM control (Hb1Ac < 7%) and remission (Hb1Ac < 6 without antidiabetics) was observed in 86.6 and 65% of cases at 1 year and 64.0% and 26.5% at 5 years, respectively. The long-term T2DM remission was predicted by baseline BMI value. Both before BPD and throughout the follow-up period, HOMA values were similar in the metabolically successful and unsuccessful subjects, while C-peptide normalized for FBG value as a marker of beta cell mass and insulin secretion increased progressively only in the former from 1.06 ± 0.64 to 1.44 ± 1.08 mcg/l ml/dl-1 * 100 (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In T2DM patients with BMI of 25-35, a positive metabolic outcome is less frequent than in their counterparts with morbid obesity. In T2DM overweight patients, in spite of a short-term normalization of FBG and HbA1c levels and a well-sustained increase of insulin sensitivity, a long-term T2DM relapse occurs in the majority of the cases. While the surgically obtained decrease in insulin resistance leads to T2DM control in half of the patients, the increase in insulin secretion is mandatory for T2DM stable remission.

Second-stage duodenal switch for sleeve gastrectomy failure: A matched controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the predominant bariatric surgery worldwide. However, the surgical management in case of failure is still debated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risks and benefits of converting SG to biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) for suboptimal outcome after SG. SETTING: University-affiliated tertiary care center. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent a laparoscopic second-stage duodenal switch (DS) for weight loss failure after SG and had a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Patients were matched 1:1 for age, sex, body mass index, and year of surgery with a group of patients who underwent a single-stage laparoscopic BPD-DS. Data were obtained from our prospective electronic database and are reported as the mean ± standard deviation, comparing 2- versus 1-stage BPD-DS. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included (59 in each group). There was no significant difference in initial body mass index (53.8 ± 9.7 versus 52.7 ± 7.8 kg/m2, P = .4), age (44.0 ± 10.2 versus 43.4 ± 9.6 yr, P = .5), and sex ratio (37 female/22 male, P > .9) between the 2 groups. Mean follow-up was 59.9 ± 27 months, with an 85% (n = 100) follow-up rate. Patients were converted to BPD-DS after a mean 24.4 ± 10.2 months. There was no short- or long-term mortality. Major 90-days complications occurred in 2%, 5%, and 5% after SG, second-stage DS and single-stage BPD-DS, respectively (P > .05). At the time of conversion, the excess weight loss for SG was 39 ± 17% and total weight loss was 20 ± 9%. After DS or single-stage BPD-DS, the excess weight loss was 74.8 ± 18% versus 87.9 ± 18% at 1 year (n = 107, P = .00021), 80.2 ± 17% versus 92.3 ± 14% at 2 years (n = 100, P = .002), and 80.2 ± 18% versus 87.2 ± 16% at 3 years (n = 70, P = .6). Total weight loss was 38.7 ± 9% versus 44.5 ± 8% at 1 year (P = .0004), 41.2 ± 9% versus 46.8 ± 7% at 2 years (P = .001), and 42.3 ± 9% versus 45.1 ± 9% at 3 years (P = .2). The incidence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension before surgery were 61% versus 54% and 58% versus 47%. Remission rate for type 2 diabetes increased from 59% to 94% after second-stage DS (P = .001), which is identical to first-stage BPD-DS (94%). Remission of hypertension increased from 42% to 77% after second-stage DS (P = .03) and was 71% after first-stage BPD-DS (P = .8). CONCLUSION: Second-stage DS is an effective option for the management of suboptimal outcomes of SG, with an additional 41% excess weight loss and 35% remission rate for type 2 diabetes. At 3 years, the global outcomes of staged approach did not significantly differ from single-stage BPD-DS; however, longer-term outcomes are still needed.

Influence of Biliopancreatic Diversion on Pregnancy Outcomes in Comparison to Other Bariatric Surgery Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy after bariatric surgery (BS) has an increased risk for small-for-gestational-age infants (SGA), shorter length of gestation, and probably perinatal mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate if biliopancreatic diversion could impair pregnancy outcomes in comparison to other bariatric surgery procedures. METHODS: We conducted a cohort retrospective single-center study in 65 women before and after BS. Thirty-one pregnancies occurred before BS, while 109 after BS, amongst which n = 51 after biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and n = 58 after non-malabsorptive procedures. RESULTS: The pregnancy outcomes after BS in comparison with those before BS resulted less affected by diabetes, hypertensive disorders, macrosomia, and large-for-gestational-age (LGA), but more complicated by preterm births (14.5 versus 4.0%) and low birth weight (LBW) infants (28.9 versus 0%). Moreover, mean birth weight resulted lower after BS than before BS (p < 0.001). In pregnancies after BPD in comparison to those before BS, the LBW rate (42.5%) resulted a drastic increase (p < 0.001), and mean birth weight (p < 0.001) and mean birth weight centile (p < 0.001) were lower after BPD. When pregnancy outcomes after BPD were compared with those after non-malabsorptive procedures, the rate of congenital anomalies, preterm births, LBW, and SGA resulted an increase (p = 0.002, 0.008, 0.032, and < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: BPD drastically reduced diabetes, hypertensive disorders, macrosomia, and LGA; however, it was associated with the poorest pregnancy outcomes in comparison to those observed after other BS procedures. On the basis of the present study, we recommend a cautious multidisciplinary selection of severely obese patients for BPD during the fertile age.

The anorexigenic peptide neurotensin relates to insulin sensitivity in obese patients after BPD or RYGB metabolic surgery.

Neurotensin is a peptide with effects on appetite and intestinal lipid absorption. Experimental data suggest a role in glucose homeostasis, while human data is missing. Here, 20 morbidly obese subjects either underwent biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD), or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in a randomized fashion. Before and 1 year after surgery, anthropometric data, body composition, clinical biochemistry, insulin sensitivity by means of euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps (HEC) and fasting plasma proneurotensin 1-117 were analyzed. Plasma proneurotensin increased significantly more 1 year after BDP than RYGB (P = 0.028), while weight loss was comparable. After metabolic surgery, proneurotensin correlated positively with insulin sensitivity (M-value) (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), while an inverse relationship with fasting glucose, HOMA-IR and HbA1c was observed (P < 0.05 for all components). After adjustment for age and gender, proneurotensin and BMI remained independently related with delta of M-value (ß = 0.46 and ß = 0.51, P < 0.05, resp.). From these data we conclude that proneurotensin positively correlates with insulin sensitivity uniquely after weight loss induced by metabolic surgery in humans. BDP leads to a stronger increase in the anorexigenic peptide compared to RYGB.

Revisional Malabsorptive Bariatric Surgery: 29-Year Follow-up in a Brazilian Public Hospital.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of 67 patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgeries over a 29-year period in a Brazilian public hospital. METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent revisional bariatric surgery from January 1987 to December of 2016 at our hospital were analyzed for weight loss and complications. Descriptive statistics and paired t tests were computed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The primary surgeries previously performed on these patients were biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) (37 cases, 55.2%), jejunoileal bypass (JIB) (24 cases, 35.8%), sleeve gastrectomy (4 cases, 5.9%), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) (1 case, 1.5%), and laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (1 case, 1.5%). The indications for revisional surgery were as follows: malnutrition in 29 cases (43.3%), failure to lose weight in 27 cases (40.3%), weight regain in 5 cases (7.5%), and untreatable diarrhea in 6 cases (9.2%). Most revisional surgeries were performed using JIB or BPD-DS. Operative mortality was higher after the revisional procedures compared with that following the primary bariatric surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients requiring a revisional surgery had undergone a primary BPD-DS or JIB. Severe and untreatable malnutrition and diarrhea were the main indications for the revisional procedures. RYGB produced significant and sustainable weight loss and exhibited a low risk of malnutrition or requiring revisional surgery.

[Current status and changes of metabolic and bariatric surgery in China].

Through continuous development, metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) has become widely recognized in academic and medical circles. In China, the volume of MBS operations has increased year by year. Therapeutic goals of MBS have evolved from treating obesity to treating Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and further to treating a series of obesity-associated metabolic diseases (including conditions in the endocrine system, circulatory system, respiratory system, reproductive system, and etc). Surgical approach of MBS has also been evolving continuously. Currently the common surgical procedures include laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and bilio-pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). All surgical procedures have pros and cons, and the choice of surgical procedures should be based on the conditions of patients, the surgeon's technical ability, and benefits and operative risks. With the development of MBS, the proportions of different surgical procedures also changed in China. In recent five years, the proportion of AGB has decreased continuously and LAGB is no longer a common procedure. The proportion of LSG has increased rapidly, rising from 9% in 2010 to 55% in 2015. The proportion of RYGB has increased from 57% to 64% between 2010 and 2013, and remained at 45% afterwards. Since 2010, most MBS operations are laparoscopic surgery. 3D Laparoscopic surgery, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery and da Vinci Robotic Surgery have also been introduced in MBS. This review discusses the status quo and changes of MBS in china, as well as the new technology in MBS, aiming to strengthen the information and comprehension of MBS in china.

[Choice of bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures].

Bariatric and metabolic surgery has become the clinical hot topic of the treatment of metabolic syndromes including obesity and diabetes mellitus, but how to choose the appropriate surgical procedure remains the difficult problem in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery(ASMBS)(version 2013) introduced the procedures of bariatric and metabolic surgery mainly including biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch(BPD-DS), laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy(LSG). To choose the appropriate bariatric and metabolic procedure, the surgeons should firstly understand the indications and the contraindications of each procedure. Procedure choice should also consider personal condition (body mass index, comorbidities and severity of diabetes), family and socioeconomic status (postoperative follow-up attendance, understanding of potential surgical risk of gastrectomy and patient's will), family and disease history (patients with high risk of gastric cancer should avoid LRYGB; patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease should avoid LSG) and associated personal factors of surgeons. With the practice of bariatric and metabolic surgery, the defects, especially long-term complications, of different procedures were found. For example, LRYGB resulted in higher incidence of postoperative anemia and marginal ulcer, high risk of gastric cancer as well as the requirement of vitamin supplementation and regular follow-up. Though LSG has lower surgical risk, its efficacy of diabetes mellitus remission and long-term weight loss are inferior to the LRYGB. These results pose challenges to the surgeons to balance the benefits and risks of the bariatric procedures. A lot of factors can affect the choice of bariatric and metabolic procedure. Surgeons should choose the procedure according to patient's condition with the consideration of the choice of patients. The bariatric and metabolic surgery not only manages the diabetes mellitus and weight loss, but also results in the reconstruction of gastrointestinal tract and side effect. Postoperative surgical complications and nutritional deficiency should also be considered. Thereby, individualized bariatric procedure with the full consideration of each related factors is the ultimate objective of bariatric and metabolic surgery.

Revision Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass to Biliopancreatic Long-Limb Gastric Bypass for Inadequate Weight Response: Case Series and Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The long-limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LLRYGB) was introduced in 1987 as a salvage operation for inadequate weight loss after a standard Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: We report on 53 consecutive patients (44 females) with conversion of a failed RYGB to a LLRYGB performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2014. No patient had an ascertainable anatomic abnormality to explain his/her weight regain. LLRYGB revision consisted of a 75-cm to 100-cm alimentary Roux limb and a 75-cm to 100-cm common channel; after 2011, in suitable patients, the Roux limb was lengthened to greater than 250 cm. RESULTS: Average values for weight (lbs) were as follows: pre-original RYGB = 329; lowest measured after RYGB = 196; at time of LLRYGB = 285; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, >5 years post LLRYGB = 225, 207, 199, 197, 195, for a sustained weight loss >90 lbs. Average values for BMI (kg/m2) were as follows: pre-original RYGB = 54.3; lowest measured after RYGB = 32.3; at time of LLRYGB = 47.2; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, >5 years post LLRYGB = 37.1, 34.4, 33.0, 32.8, 31.4, for a sustained BMI reduction >16.5 kg/m2. Zero operative mortality; 3 (5.7%) late deaths; 7 (13.2%) 30-day complications; 33 (62.3%) long-term complications with 23 (43.4%) needing TPN; and 14 (26.4%) requiring operative revision. CONCLUSION: A salvage LLRYGB procedure can be performed safely and is weight successful, but fraught with long-term nutritional problems and a high necessity for revision. A Roux segment over 250 cm may improve outcomes.

A Matched Cohort Analysis of Stomach Intestinal Pylorus Saving (SIPS) Surgery Versus Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch with Two-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In bariatric surgery, the procedure with the highest average weight loss is the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPDDS). A new simplified duodenal switch called the stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery with less malabsorption and one fewer anastomosis claims to have similar outcomes when compared to the BPDDS. METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort analysis of SIPS versus BPDDS patients in a single private practice was obtained by matching every BPDDS to a SIPS patient of the same gender and BMI. Excess weight loss percentage (EWL), BMI, and percentage total weight loss (%TWL) were compared. Additionally, comorbidity resolution, nutritional data, and complications were also compared. Data was analyzed using both descriptive and comparative statistics. RESULTS: Over 2 years, there was no statistical difference in weight loss between BPDDS and SIPS. There also was no difference in nutritional data between the two procedures pre- and post-op. Complication rates were lower in SIPS however, due to the small sample sizes this is not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Weight loss and nutritional results between SIPS and BPDDS are similar at 2 years. However, there are fewer complications with SIPS.

Protein malnutrition incidence comparison after gastric bypass versus biliopancreatic diversion / Comparación de la incidencia de malnutrición proteica tras bypass gástrico versus derivación biliopancreática

Background: bariatric surgery is widely employed nowadays. Nutritional complications following malabsorptive bariatric surgery are common. Objectives: to compare protein malnutrition incidence, the amount of protein intake and the influence of various risk factors in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and biliopancreatic diversion (BPD). Methods: retrospective study comparing the development of hypoalbuminemia in 92 patients undergoing BPD and 121 RYGB, before surgery and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after it. Protein intake was estimated by serum prealbumin. The influence of prior body mass index (BMI), age and sex was analyzed. Results: hypoprealbuminemia was found in around 40% of patients 3 months after both procedures, decreasing to about 10% after 2 years of surgery. Hypoalbuminemia incidence was close to 20% in the first post-surgery year in BPD, persisting in 10-15% of cases thereafter. After RYGB, hypoalbuminemia incidence was lower (5-9% in all postoperative follow-up measurements). During the first year after surgery, hypoalbuminemia was more frequent after BPD than after RYGB (at the 3rd month (OR:3.9; p=0.006; 95%CI:1.5-10.4), 6th (OR:5.0; p=0.002; 95% CI:1.8-13.8), and at the 12th month (OR:4.4;p=0.007;95%;CI:1.5-12.8)), but not after the first year. A higher preoperative BMI favored it (OR: 1.03; p=0.046; 95% CI:1-1.06), as well as greater age during the first 6 months. Conclusion: Patients with BPD had a higher risk for hypoproteinemia than those undergoing RYGB, especially during the first year post-surgery. Higher preoperative BMI, and age (in the short-term period) could have a significant inverse relation to hypoproteinemia (AU)

Introducción: la cirugía bariátrica es muy empleada actualmente y en las malabsortivas, las complicaciones nutricionales son habituales. Objetivos: comparar la incidencia de malnutrición proteica e ingesta estimada de proteínas en pacientes intervenidos de bypass gástrico en Y-de-Roux (BGYR) y derivación biliopancreática (DBP), y la influencia de algunos factores de riesgo. Métodos: estudio restrospectivo comparando el desarrollo de hipoalbuminemia en 92 pacientes intervenidos mediante DBP y 121 de DBP (prequirúrgico, a los 3, 6, 12, 18 y 24 meses postquirúrgicos). La ingesta proteica se estimó mediante prealbúmina. Se evaluó la influencia del índice de masa corporal (IMC) previo, la edad y el sexo. Resultados: se encontró hipoprealbuminemia en torno al 40% de los pacientes a los 3 meses tras ambas técnicas, disminuyendo hasta el 10% a los dos años. La incidencia de hipoalbuminemia fue cercana al 20% durante el primer año tras DBP, persistiendo posteriormente en un 10-15% de los casos. Tras el BGYR, dicha incidencia fue menor (5-9% en todos los momentos). Así, durante el primer año postquirúrgico la hipoalbuminemia fue más frecuente tras DBP [3 meses: (OR:3,9;p=0,006; 95%CI:1,5- 10,4), 6 meses (OR:5,0; p=0,002; 95% CI:1,8-13,8), y al año (OR:4,4;p=0,007;95%;CI:1,5-12,8)], pero no así después. Un mayor IMC prequirúrgico favoreció la inicidencia de hipoalbuminemia (OR:1,03; p=0,046; 95% CI:1-1,06), así como una mayor edad a los 6 meses postquirúrgicos. Conclusión: los pacientes intervenidos mediante DBP tuvieron mayor riesgo de presentar hipoproteinemia que tras BGYR, especialmente durante el primer año postquirúrgico. Un mayor IMC postquirúrgico y la edad (a los 6 meses) podrían favorecer la aparición de hipoproteinemia (AU)

Short-term changes in macronutrient intake in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion: a longitudinal study / Cambios a corto plazo en la ingesta de macronutrientes en pacientes sometidos a derivación biliopancreática: estudio longitudinal

Introduction: biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has been shown to be one of the most effective techniques for losing weight, although nutritional education also might play an important role. Our aim was to determine the effect of the combination of a nutrition educational program (NEP) and BPD on changes in the intake of energy and macronutrients after the surgery. Methodology: this longitudinal study included all patients eligible for BPD who filled in a dietary record. Two assessments were performed: six weeks before and twelve months after surgery. The nutrition educational program was given two weeks after surgery by a registered dietitian and a 3-day food record was collected for further analysis at both of the assessments. Results: 68 patients were included. The percentage of excess weight loss was 60.76% (SD 14.50%). A year after the surgery there was a reduction of energy (−602.27 kcal [SD 930.19 kcal], p<0.001), percentage of fat (−4.79% [SD 11.38%], p=0.001), and an increase in the percentage of protein (+2.72% [SD 7.10%], p=0.002). A lower consumption of fat, especially of polyunsaturated fatty acids, was observed in the patients that achieved the nutritional recommendations and in the super-obese patients. Conclusion: The combination of NEP and BPD resulted in an improvement in the nutritional profile, with a reduction of fat and maintenance of the protein intake (AU)

Introducción: la derivación biliopancreática (DBP) ha demostrado ser una de las técnicas más efectivas en la pérdida de peso, aunque la educación nutricional también puede jugar un papel importante. El objetivo del estudio fue determinar el efecto de la combinación de un programa de educación nutricional (PEN) y DBP en los cambios de ingesta energética y de macronutrientes después de la cirugía. Métodos: estudio transversal que incluyó a todos los pacientes subsidiarios de DBP que cumplimentaron la encuesta dietética. Se realizaron dos valoraciones: seis semanas antes y doce meses después de la cirugía. El PEN fue impartido dos semanas después de la cirugía por una dietista-nutricionista. Fue recogida una encuesta dieté- tica de tres días en ambas visitas para realizar el análisis nutricional de la ingesta. Resultados: fueron incluidos 68 pacientes. El porcentaje de exceso de peso perdido fue de 60,76% (DE 14,50%). Un año después de la intervención se produjo una disminución de la ingesta calórica (−602,27 kcal [DE 930,19 kcal], p<0,001), de porcentaje de grasa (−4,79% [DE 11,38%], p=0,001), y un incremento en el porcentaje de proteínas (+2,72% [DE 7,10%], p=0,002). Se observó una menor ingesta de grasa, especialmente de ácidos grasos poliinsaturados, en aquellos pacientes que habían alcanzado las recomendaciones nutricionales planteadas en el PEN y en los super-obesos. Conclusión: la combinación de PEN y DBP logró una mejora en el perfil nutricional de la dieta tras una reducción de la ingesta grasa y un mantenimiento de la ingesta proteica (AU)

Relationship Between Diet and Body Composition After Biliopancreatic Diversion.

BACKGROUND: Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has been shown to be one of the most effective techniques for losing weight, although the relationship between body composition and diet after the procedure is not well known. Our aim was to assess dietary changes and their effects on body composition. METHODOLOGY: This longitudinal study included all patients eligible for BPD who had undergone body composition analysis. Two assessments were performed: 6 weeks before and 1 year after surgery. Nutritional education was given after surgery by a registered dietitian, and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed and a 3-day food record was collected for further analysis at both of the visits. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included. The percentage of excess of weight loss was 61.03 % (SD 14.01 %), which was statistically different by gender (p = 0.045). The percentage of subjects reporting a low daily protein consumption of less than 60 g and 1.2 g/kg of ideal body weight (IBW)/day was 15.2 % before surgery and 19.6 % at 12 months (p = 0.006). The weight loss was mainly of fat mass (FM). There were differences of body composition by gender before and after surgery. A simple correlation analysis showed a significant association between daily energy intake and FM (g) only before surgery (p = 0.030), and also between daily protein intake (expressed as total g) and lean body mass (LBM) 12 months after surgery (p = 0.018), but no association was found with achieved protein goal. CONCLUSION: BPD enhanced by nutritional education seems to improve its results by achieving an adequate weight loss, preserving LBM, decreasing FM, and guaranteeing an appropriate protein intake.

Anesthesia for bariatric surgery: 8-year retrospective study: are our patients now easier to manage?

OBJECTIVES: To review the perioperative management of patients who had undergone bariatric surgery in our institution during an 8-year period, with the aim of identifying variables that correlated with improved clinical outcomes and changes in perioperative practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of 437 patients who had undergone bariatric surgery from January 2005 to June 2013. Of these patients, 163 had undergone open or laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion (Group 1), and 274 had been managed according to a Tailored Laparoscopic Approach Program (TLAP) (Group 2). We analyzed major cardiocirculatory, pulmonary, and surgery-related complications, mortality rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, post-anesthetic care unit (PACU) length of stay, and perioperative management standards, throughout the study period. RESULTS: Changes were observed in anesthetic patterns and perioperative care standards during the study period: 25% of patients had combined epidural anesthesia in 2005, compared with none at present; ICU admissions decreased from 28.6% in 2005 to 3.1% at present; and time in PACU declined from a median of 23 h in 2005 to 5.12h at present. Duration of postoperative opioid therapy was also significantly reduced (from 48 h to 6h). Group 2 had a significantly lower mortality rate than Group 1 (0.37% versus 4.3%, respectively, P=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, adoption of a TLAP for bariatric surgery has led to changes in perioperative care standards that have been followed by clear improvements according to morbidity, mortality and management indicators.

Weight loss is more sustained after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in superobese patients.

BACKGROUND: Although biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is not the most performed procedure, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is challenged by weight regain and insufficient weight loss, especially in patients with a body mass index >50 kg/m(2). The aim of our retrospective study was to compare the weight loss after 2 types of primary bariatric surgery. A total of 83 BPD-DS and 97 RYGB procedures were performed from March 2002 to October 2009 for an initial mean body mass index of 55 kg/m(2). METHODS: All RYGB patients underwent surgery at a private practice hospital and BPD-DS patients underwent surgery at a university hospital before February 2007 and at the same private hospital thereafter. The patients were seen in follow-up every 4 months the first year, every 6 months the second, and yearly thereafter. The maximum weight loss was assessed, as well as the weight regain beyond the first postoperative year. Weight loss success was defined as a percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) of ≥50%. RESULTS: The patients did not differ by age, gender, or length of follow-up (mean 46 mo, range .5-102 for RYGB and 44.3 mo, range 9-111 for BPD-DS). Of the patients, 17 RYGB and 7 BPD-DS patients were lost to follow-up within 3 years postoperatively. At 3 years of follow-up, the mean %EWL was 63.7% ± 17.0% after RYGB and 84.0% ± 14.5% after BPD-DS (P < .0001). Weight loss success was achieved by 83.5% of the RYGB and 98.7% of the BPD-DS patients (P = .0005). CONCLUSION: After 12 months postoperatively, the number of patients regaining 10% of the weight lost during the first postoperative year was significantly greater after RYGB than after BPD-DS.

Long-term outcome with the prophylactic use of polypropylene mesh in morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion.

The use of prosthetic material to prevent incisional hernia in clean-contaminated procedures as bariatric surgery remains controversial. We present our experience on 45 consecutive morbidly obese patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion that was closed using a polypropylene mesh. Moreover, we reviewed the outcome of the 50 previous consecutive obese patients who underwent biliopancreatic diversion and conventional closure of the abdomen in order to compare the outcome between the two groups after a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Between January 2006 and February 2010, 95 morbidly obese patients underwent open biliopancreatic diversion at our department. During the first 2 years of our experience, there were 50 obese patients whose open biliopancreatic diversion was closed conventionally (without mesh). Starting on February 2008 and until February 2010, 45 patients received prophylactic midline reinforcement by the positioning of retrorectal muscle polypropylene mesh. The outcome at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was analyzed comparing the two groups of patients. No mesh infection occurred. Minor local complications occurred similarly in both groups. The incidence of postoperative hernia was significantly higher in the group conventionally closed (30%) than in the mesh group (4.4%) at 2-year follow-up (p < 0.05). The prophylactic use of mesh in open bariatric surgery is safe and effective at 2-year follow-up.